Latest News Update About Hot Students in Toilet video satisfy your passions video scandal:A steamy sex video of two first-year female students caused uproar in Anglo-Chinese Junior College (ACJC) recently, leading to the duo leaving the school.
The students were said to have had a tryst in a school toilet where other students filmed them. The video was then circulated to several others in the college. In an interview with the Straits Times, a current ACJC student voiced, “‘What I saw disgusted me.” The second-year student said he could not bring himself to continue watching the rest of the clip.
In the illicit ACJC episode, which took place last month it is not clear whether the girls knew they were being filmed. It seems that disciplinary action has been taken on all those involved, including the stripping of some of their positions in co-curricular activities.
In an e-mail response to queries, ACJC principal Kelvyna Chan declined to comment directly on the facts of the episode. She would say only: ‘We would like to assure you that no one has been expelled from the school. From time to time, students are involved in actions which the school does not condone. ‘With all matters pertaining to discipline, we include engagement with the parents and counseling for the students. The objective is always to learn from our mistakes, do better and be wiser.’
One of the students is said to have been admitted into another junior college and will resume her studies next year.
For Ms Wendy Chua, a former school psychologist who now runs a life coaching company, the latest ACJC incident shows how cavalier the young are about the Internet.
‘These days you often see kids freely expressing themselves on sites like Facebook with no regard to their own privacy. There is no self-censorship,’ said the mother of four children aged seven to 15. ‘If you don’t censor what you put online about yourself, you won’t censor what you post about others.
Psychologist Daniel Koh, of Insights Mind Centre, felt several aspects made the ACJC case especially disturbing.
First was the fact that the incident happened in a public place and involved two girls, ’something society may not accept yet’. Then there were the actions of those who filmed what the girls did and then circulated it. Both were troubling acts, he said.
Agreeing, Dr Carol Balhetchet, director of Youth Services at the Singapore Children’s Society, said that filming and circulating the incident was ‘a vicious act’. ‘I would almost call it aggressive intimidation,’ she said.
The child experts felt that parents and counselors need to better educate the young on the consequences of their actions. Parents what do you think? How would you react to such a matter if this was your child who was involved?Read More, Stay with us for more news.
No comments:
Post a Comment